10 Best Grasshopper Alternatives with AI Answering
Grasshopper gives you a business number that rings your cell phone. That's the whole product. When you can pick up, it works fine. When you can't, the caller hits voicemail, and most callers in 2026 won't leave one. That single gap drives most searches for Grasshopper alternatives.
Marcus runs a two-truck plumbing company on Grasshopper's Solo Plus plan. He spent an hour under a sink last Tuesday and surfaced to two voicemails and one hang-up. The hang-up was a water heater replacement, an $1,800 job, and the caller had already booked the next plumber on Google. Sound familiar?
That gap is exactly what AI answering fixes, and it's why so many owners are pricing out Grasshopper alternatives. Grasshopper has no AI answering at all: its official fix is Ruby, a live human answering service that starts around $160/mo, double the cost of Grasshopper's top plan. Meanwhile, the market has sprinted ahead. According to Fortune Business Insights, the conversational AI market is projected to grow from $18 billion in 2026 to over $82 billion by 2034, and business phones are one of its fastest-moving corners.
TL;DR:
- Grasshopper forwards calls to your cell and can't answer one for you. There's no AI receptionist, no integrations, and no API on any plan.
- The best Grasshopper alternative for most small teams is dialnote: $49/mo flat with unlimited users, an AI receptionist that answers 24/7 at $0.89/min, and a phone menu that controls how much AI you pay for.
- Full phone systems with AI answering: dialnote, Quo (formerly OpenPhone), Dialpad, RingCentral, GoTo Connect, Nextiva, and Phone.com. AI-only services that bolt onto any number: Smith.ai, Rosie, and Goodcall.
- Only some vendors publish AI pricing. Phone.com charges $29.99/mo and RingCentral starts at $39/mo, while GoTo Connect, Nextiva, and Dialpad all send you to sales.
- You can port your Grasshopper number to any provider here in 1 to 3 weeks.
Quick comparison: the 10 best Grasshopper alternatives
Here's the side-by-side snapshot before we go deep on each option.
| Alternative | Type | Starting price* | AI answering | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dialnote | Phone system + AI | $49/mo flat, unlimited users | Included; $0.89/min + free credits | 4.5★ G2 |
| Quo (formerly OpenPhone) | Phone system + AI | $15/user/mo | Sona included; 10 free calls/mo, packs from $25/mo | 4.7★ G2 |
| Dialpad | Phone system + AI | $15/user/mo | AI auto-attendant included; autonomous agents quote-only | 4.4★ G2 |
| RingCentral | Phone system + AI add-on | $20/user/mo | AIR from $39/mo + per-minute usage | 4.2★ G2 |
| GoTo Connect | Phone system + AI add-on | ~$26/user/mo (quote-gated) | Add-on, quote-only | 4.4★ G2 |
| Nextiva | Phone system + AI add-on | $15/user/mo | XBert add-on, reported ~$99/mo | 4.5★ G2 |
| Phone.com | Phone system + AI add-on | $15/user/mo | AI-Connect, $29.99/mo for 100 min | 4.3★ Trustpilot |
| Smith.ai | AI-only (per call) | Free (25 calls/mo); $150/mo Pro | Per-call, ~$1.67-$3.00/call | 4.9★ G2** |
| Rosie | AI-only (per minute) | $49/mo, 250 min | Per-minute buckets | Few reviews |
| Goodcall | AI-only (per caller) | $79/mo per agent | Per unique caller, unlimited minutes | Few reviews |
| Grasshopper (reference) | Virtual number app | $14/mo flat | None (human Ruby add-on from ~$160/mo) | 3.9★ G2 |
*Annual billing where offered; prices verified August 2026 from vendor pricing pages and shift often, so check before you buy. **Smith.ai's 4.9 is for its human receptionist plans; the AI product has a smaller review base.
Why are people looking for a Grasshopper alternative?
Because Grasshopper can't answer a call for you. It's a forwarding layer: your business number rings your cell, and a missed call goes to voicemail. There's no AI receptionist on any plan, no CRM integrations, and no API, so the only way to get calls answered is to bolt on a human service that costs more than Grasshopper itself.
The pricing is genuinely cheap. True Solo runs $14/mo on annual billing ($18 monthly) for one user, one number, and one extension. Solo Plus is $25/mo ($32 monthly) with three extensions, and Small Business is $80/mo ($92 monthly) with four numbers and unlimited extensions. So what does that low sticker price actually buy? Forwarding, voicemail transcription, and a basic auto-attendant. That's the list.
The reviews tell the rest of the story. Grasshopper sits at 3.9 on G2 and around 2.1 on Trustpilot, and the complaints cluster hard: you can't cancel through the website or app, A2P texting registration fails and blocks business SMS for weeks, support is slow to fix either, and the app itself feels dated, with users reporting dropped calls and push notifications that silently fail. A phone product that misses calls quietly is the worst kind of cheap.
What to look for in a Grasshopper alternative
Four things separate a real upgrade from a sideways move.
AI answering that's actually included, at a published price. This is where vendors hide the ball. Phone.com publishes its AI price ($29.99/mo) and so does dialnote ($0.89/min with free credits). But GoTo Connect, Nextiva, and Dialpad all gate their AI answering behind a sales call, which makes budgeting a guessing game.
A phone system and AI on one bill. Three tools on this list (Smith.ai, Rosie, Goodcall) are AI-only: they answer calls but don't replace Grasshopper as your phone system, so you'd still pay for business calling somewhere. That's fine as a first step. It's rarely the cheapest end state.
A phone menu that routes calls before the AI. Every AI answering tool meters usage somehow: per minute, per call, or per caller. The fastest way to overspend is letting AI answer everything. A phone menu sends billing and sales to a person or a mailbox and routes only the calls that need coverage (say, after-hours and overflow) to the AI.
Number porting. Your Grasshopper number moves with you. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling a new number you don't need.
For a deeper feature checklist, our guide to the best AI receptionist software breaks down what separates a capable AI agent from a glorified voicemail.
The 10 best Grasshopper alternatives with AI answering
The first seven are full phone systems with AI answering built in or bolted on. The last three are AI-only services you can point any number at, including a Grasshopper number you're not ready to leave.
1. dialnote: best overall Grasshopper alternative
dialnote fixes the two things Grasshopper can't: it's a real phone system for your whole team, and it answers calls when you can't. The $49 Team plan covers unlimited users at one flat price, and it's where the AI receptionist and phone menu switch on.
The AI answers 24/7, asks your qualifying questions, books meetings through Calendly or Cal.com, sends texts, transfers urgent calls to a teammate, and speaks 14 languages. Usage is billed at $0.89/min with free credits included each month, and the phone menu routes calls first, so the AI only handles the calls you choose. Marcus's water heater caller would've been booked before the competition's phone even rang.

| SoloPhone system only, no AI | $19/mo |
| TeamUnlimited users; AI receptionist + phone menu, most popular | $49/mo |
| BusinessUnlimited users; advanced routing | $99/mo |
| AI voice usageMetered, free credits included each month | $0.89/min |
Flat pricing per account, not per user. The $49 Team plan turns on the AI receptionist and phone menu for your whole team. 10-day free trial, no credit card. As of August 2026.
Pros
- One flat plan from $49 covers your whole team's phone system and the AI receptionist, with no per-user fees
- A phone menu routes only the calls you choose to the AI, so you control the metered spend
- Books via Calendly or Cal.com, transfers to teammates, sends SMS, and answers in 14 languages
- Published pricing for everything, including the AI rate
Cons
- AI usage is metered, so letting the AI answer every call still adds up (the phone menu exists to manage that)
- Newer platform with a smaller review base than RingCentral or Nextiva
- Built for inbound-first small teams, not outbound sales dialing
Ready to stop paying by the call?
10-day free trial, no credit card needed.
What users say: Teams switching from forward-to-cell tools describe the same before-and-after: calls that used to die in voicemail now come back as a transcript, a booked meeting, and a text confirmation. The flat bill is the other theme, because adding a fourth or fifth teammate costs nothing.
Best for: Small teams leaving Grasshopper who want the phone answered, not just forwarded. See exactly how the two stack up in our dialnote vs Grasshopper comparison.
2. Quo (formerly OpenPhone): best for teams that live in text
If you've seen OpenPhone recommended as a Grasshopper alternative, this is the same product: OpenPhone rebranded to Quo in 2026. It's a modern per-user phone system built around shared numbers and a shared text inbox, and its Sona AI agent answers missed calls, takes messages, answers FAQs, and texts callers scheduling links.
Every plan includes 1,000 Sona credits a month, which covers about 10 AI-answered calls. Past that, credit packs run $25/mo to $199/mo, which works out to roughly $0.45 to $1.00 per call.

| StarterAnnual billing ($19 monthly); includes Sona starter credits | $15/user/mo |
| BusinessAnnual ($33 monthly); AI summaries, HubSpot + Salesforce | $23/user/mo |
| ScaleAnnual ($47 monthly); AI call tags, priority support | $35/user/mo |
| Sona credit packsBeyond the 10 included AI calls/mo | $25-$199/mo |
Per-user pricing. Every plan includes 1,000 Sona credits (about 10 AI-answered calls) per month. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Highest-rated tool on this list (4.7 on G2 across 3,300+ reviews)
- Shared numbers and a team text inbox that small teams genuinely like
- Sona is included on every tier with starter credits, no add-on purchase to test it
Cons
- Support is slow (days to weeks by email), with phone support only on the top plan
- Recurring reports of call reliability issues on cellular data away from Wi-Fi
- 10 included AI calls a month is a taste, not coverage; busy lines need paid packs
What users say: G2 reviewers love the interface and texting workflows, and it shows in the 4.7 rating. The consistent gripes are support response times and connection issues when reps work off Wi-Fi, which matters if your team is in trucks, not at desks.
Best for: Small teams that text customers as much as they call them and want a modern app with AI answering included in small doses.
3. Dialpad: best per-seat AI feature depth
Dialpad is the AI-first phone system of the group. Even its cheapest seat includes real-time transcription, AI summaries, and a natural-language auto-attendant that routes callers by what they say. For pure included-AI-per-dollar on a per-seat plan, it's hard to beat at $15/user/mo.
The catch? Answering is the one AI thing it won't quote publicly. Dialpad's autonomous AI agents, the ones that handle a call end to end, are credit-based and priced by sales conversation only. We compare it against nine rivals in our best Dialpad alternatives guide.

| StandardAnnual billing ($27 monthly); AI transcription + summaries | $15/user/mo |
| ProAnnual ($35 monthly); 3-seat minimum, CRM integrations | $25/user/mo |
| Enterprise100-seat minimum | Custom |
| AI agentsAutonomous answering, credit-based | Quote only |
The natural-language auto-attendant is included in Connect plans; autonomous AI agents that answer calls end to end are quote-only. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Most included AI per dollar at the entry price (transcription, summaries, smart routing)
- Mature platform with strong Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 integrations
- 4.4 on G2 across 4,100+ reviews
Cons
- Autonomous AI answering has no published price, so you can't budget it without a sales call
- CRM integrations require the Pro tier and its 3-seat minimum
- Reviewers report dropped transfers and slow support on lower tiers
What users say: The transcription accuracy earns steady praise, and teams that live in Google Workspace find it slots right in. Recurring complaints center on calls dropping during transfers, transcription lag on long calls, and the gap between the $15 sticker and what a sales team actually pays.
Best for: Teams that want built-in AI note-taking and coaching on every call and are comfortable negotiating the answering piece with sales.
4. RingCentral: best for integrations and enterprise features
RingCentral is the heavyweight: voice, video, fax, SMS, and a catalog of 300+ integrations. Its AI Receptionist (AIR) is a real multilingual answering agent that books appointments and syncs to your CRM, priced from $39/mo as an add-on (or $49/mo standalone with 100 minutes, then $0.50/min).

| CoreAnnual billing ($30 monthly) | $20/user/mo |
| AdvancedAnnual ($35 monthly) | $25/user/mo |
| UltraAnnual ($45 monthly) | $35/user/mo |
| AI Receptionist (AIR)$49 standalone incl. 100 min, then $0.50/min | From $39/mo |
AIR usage bills in 30-second increments. Invoices add a cost-recovery fee and E911 fee on top of sticker prices. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Deepest feature set and integration catalog of any option here
- AIR is a genuine AI receptionist: multilingual, books appointments, syncs CRM data
- Enterprise-grade reliability and admin controls
Cons
- Billing surprises are the top complaint: recovery fees, E911, and 30-second rounding push real bills past the quote
- Metered AIR minutes can stack; one reviewer reported a $1,600 month
- Cancellation mid-contract makes remaining months due at once, and support is a frequent gripe
What users say: Reliability and breadth get consistent credit, and AIR's early reviews say it handles routine calls well. The loudest complaints are about money, not features: first bills that come in a third higher than quoted, and metered AI usage that's hard to forecast at volume.
Best for: Teams of 20+ that need deep integrations and can absorb enterprise-style billing. Oversized for a two-truck operation.
5. GoTo Connect: best way to stay in the Grasshopper family
Here's the twist: GoTo, the company that owns Grasshopper, sells a proper AI receptionist, just not on Grasshopper. GoTo Connect is its full phone system, and the AI Receptionist add-on answers, routes, and takes messages around the clock. If you like the Grasshopper brand but outgrew the product, this is the in-family upgrade path.
The frustration is pricing. GoTo's pricing page now lists every plan as "Contact Sales", and the AI Receptionist add-on has no public price either (it's included only in the top CX Complete bundle). The most recent reported list prices put Phone System around $26/user/mo and Connect CX around $34. Will that AI receptionist ever trickle down to Grasshopper itself? We honestly don't know, and GoTo hasn't said, which is a risky thing to wait on.

| Phone SystemReported list price; official page is quote-only | ~$26/user/mo |
| Connect CXReported list price; adds CX tools | ~$34/user/mo |
| CX CompleteAI Receptionist included | Quote only |
| AI Receptionist add-onPer-minute or 3,000-min plan, region-dependent | Quote only |
GoTo's pricing page shows no prices; per-user figures are the most recent reported list prices from July 2026 guides. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Unlimited auto attendants, dial plans, and ring groups on every plan
- The AI Receptionist add-on is new and actively promoted, and it stays in the ecosystem Grasshopper users know
- Solid 4.4 on G2 across 1,400+ reviews
Cons
- Zero pricing transparency: plans and the AI add-on both require a sales call
- Call quality and dropped-call complaints are the most common review theme
- Users report cancellation is difficult, the same complaint Grasshopper gets
What users say: Admins like how easy it is to run without an IT department. The recurring negatives are call quality wobbles, waiting days for support resolutions, and the sales-gated pricing, which several reviewers call out as a reason they shortlisted elsewhere.
Best for: Grasshopper users who want to stay under the GoTo umbrella and don't mind negotiating prices with sales.
6. Nextiva: best support on a unified platform
Nextiva pitches a unified customer platform: phone, SMS, chat, and social in one place, with a strong reputation for picking up its own support line. Its XBert AI Receptionist is an add-on on the Core and Engage plans, with broader AI bundled into the $75 Scale tier.
Pricing needs a careful read. Core is $15/user/mo on annual billing but $23 monthly, and Engage doubles from $25 annual to $50 monthly, one of the biggest annual-vs-monthly gaps in the industry. XBert's price isn't published; third-party reporting puts it around $99/mo for 100 conversations, then about $0.99 per extra conversation, but treat that as reported, not quoted.

| CoreAnnual billing ($23 monthly) | $15/user/mo |
| EngageAnnual ($50 monthly); big annual-vs-monthly gap | $25/user/mo |
| ScaleAnnual; bundles advanced AI features | $75/user/mo |
| XBert AI ReceptionistReported ~$99/mo incl. 100 conversations | Add-on, quote-gated |
Regulatory recovery and E911 fees add roughly 20-40% to advertised per-seat prices. XBert pricing is sales-gated; the $99 figure is third-party reporting. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Support quality is the standout: 4.5 on G2 across 3,600+ reviews, with fast phone answers a common theme
- Genuinely unified voice, SMS, chat, and social once configured
- XBert books appointments and syncs Google Calendar, Calendly, and Cal.com
Cons
- AI receptionist pricing isn't published, and monthly billing is dramatically pricier than annual
- Fees push real bills 20-40% above the advertised seat price
- Configuration complexity is the top review complaint, with slow multi-week setups reported
What users say: The support reputation is earned, with reviewers repeatedly describing quick, competent phone help. The friction shows up early instead: complicated setup, billing line items that weren't in the quote, and AI features that need a sales conversation to even price.
Best for: Service businesses that value reachable support above all and plan to commit annually.
7. Phone.com: closest to Grasshopper prices, with AI added
Phone.com is the budget pick that still answers the phone. Plans start at $15/user/mo on annual billing, and its AI-Connect add-on is $29.99/mo for 100 minutes of AI answering: it fields calls 24/7, filters spam and robocalls, routes by intent, answers FAQs from a knowledge base you feed it, and books appointments synced to Google or Outlook calendars.
That published price matters. Among the per-user systems here, only Phone.com and dialnote will tell you what AI answering costs without a sales call.

| BasicAnnual billing ($18 monthly) | $15/user/mo |
| PlusAnnual ($27 monthly) | $22.50/user/mo |
| ProAnnual ($40 monthly); includes call recording + analytics | $33.33/user/mo |
| AI-Connect100 minutes of AI answering, any plan | $29.99/mo |
Taxes and fees extra. Call recording is an $8/mo add-on below Pro, and conversational texting is excluded from Basic. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Cheapest per-user entry on this list with a published AI answering price
- AI-Connect handles after-hours answering, spam filtering, and calendar booking at a flat $29.99
- 30-day money-back guarantee and no contract
Cons
- Reliability complaints: glitches and outages during business hours show up across reviews
- Support has shifted to third-party providers, and users report long holds, including to cancel
- Essentials like call recording and analytics are add-ons or Pro-only, so the cheap plan grows
What users say: Trustpilot skews positive (4.3) with praise for helpful individual support reps. The thinner G2 base (3.5) is blunter: billing increases that arrive without warning and a system that hiccups at bad moments. It's a real step up from Grasshopper, but it's still a budget product.
Best for: Solo operators and two-person shops that want Grasshopper-level prices and an AI receptionist for under $50 total.
AI-only answering services (keep your current number)
The last three don't replace your phone system. They answer calls you forward to them, which means they work with any provider, even Grasshopper. That makes them the fastest fix if you're mid-contract, though you'll keep paying for business calling separately.
8. Smith.ai: best hybrid of AI and human receptionists
Smith.ai is the only option here that offers both an AI receptionist and trained human receptionists, with escalation between them. Its AI plans recently restructured: there's now a genuinely free tier (25 calls a month), then Pro at $150/mo for 75 calls and Enterprise at $500/mo for 300. Everything bills per call, not per minute, and the human plans start at $300/mo for 30 calls.
Watch the add-ons. Appointment booking, follow-up texts, call recording, and live-agent escalation each carry per-call fees on the human plans, and reviewers describe $10 calls turning into $13. We covered the whole pattern in our Smith.ai alternatives breakdown, and if you're weighing AI against human answering generally, our AI receptionist vs live answering service guide runs the numbers.

| AI Free25 calls/mo; card required, $3.00/call overage if enabled | $0/mo |
| AI Pro75 calls (~$2.00/call), overage $2.17-$2.50 | $150/mo |
| AI Enterprise300 calls (~$1.67/call), custom volumes | $500/mo |
| Human receptionists30 calls; overage $11.50/call | From $300/mo |
Per-call billing, both products. Booking ($1.50), texts ($0.50), and recording ($0.25) add per-call fees on human plans; AI-to-human escalation runs ~$3.00/call. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Only hybrid option: AI answers first, real humans available behind it
- Human plans are the best-reviewed in the category (4.9 on G2)
- New free AI tier makes it the cheapest way to test AI answering at all
Cons
- Per-call pricing punishes busy months, and the add-on fees stack on top
- Billing is the dominant complaint: BBB cases document charges continuing after cancellation
- Cancellation requires 30 days' email notice, with no self-serve option
What users say: The service quality reviews are excellent, especially from law firms and professional services on the human plans. The billing reviews are not: surprise overages when volume spikes, escalation fees firing without being enabled, and slow exits. Predictable coverage, less predictable invoices.
Best for: Professional services that want a human voice available and will watch the per-call meter closely.
9. Rosie: simplest AI answering for solo owners
Rosie is a no-frills AI receptionist for solo operators: live in minutes, trained on your website and Google profile, answering 24/7 from $49/mo. It takes messages, answers common questions, and texts you the details of every call.
Read the tiers before buying. The $49 Professional plan texts callers a booking link but can't book an appointment in-call; actual calendar booking and live transfers start on the $149 Scale plan. And the overage rate past your minute bucket isn't published on the pricing page, which we'd like to see fixed.

| Professional250 min; message-taking, texts booking links | $49/mo |
| Scale1,000 min; in-call booking + live transfers | $149/mo |
| Growth2,000 min; custom training, priority support | $299/mo |
AI-only, no phone system included. Overage reported around $0.25/min but not published by the vendor. 7-day free trial; annual billing gives 2 months free. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Cheapest credible entry point for 24/7 AI answering, with genuinely easy self-serve setup
- Natural-sounding voice, bilingual answering, and a free website chat widget on every plan
- Purpose-built for home services and solo operators
Cons
- The $49 plan can't book appointments in-call; that starts at $149
- Essentially no verified third-party review base yet, so claims are mostly vendor-sourced
- Knowledge comes from scraping your website, and there's no outbound calling
What users say: There's the honest catch: almost nothing verified exists on G2, Capterra, or Trustpilot yet, and the App Store listing has a handful of ratings. The vendor claims 1,900+ businesses. The feedback that does circulate praises setup speed and warns about blowing through minute buckets with long-winded callers.
Best for: One-person businesses that need calls answered and messages taken today, at the lowest price that credibly works.
10. Goodcall: predictable per-caller pricing
Goodcall flips the meter: instead of minutes, it bills per unique caller per month, with unlimited minutes on every plan. Chatty callers, long questions, repeat calls from the same customer, none of it costs extra. For businesses with talkative regulars, that's the most predictable bill in the category.
The trade-off is polish. Reviewers describe the voice as noticeably robotic with more lag than newer rivals, and the Starter plan's single logic flow forces upgrades early. If that trade-off worries you, our Goodcall alternatives guide compares ten better-sounding options.

| StarterPer agent; 100 unique callers, 1 logic flow | $79/mo |
| Growth250 unique callers, 3 logic flows | $129/mo |
| Scale500 unique callers, 25 logic flows | $249/mo |
AI-only, no phone system included. Unlimited minutes on all tiers; $0.50 per unique caller over the cap. Annual billing ~15% off. As of August 2026.
Pros
- Unlimited minutes make costs predictable for long or repeat calls
- Per-unique-caller billing is cheap for businesses with heavy repeat customers
- Set up in under 30 minutes with no engineering help
Cons
- Voice sounds robotic with noticeable latency compared to newer AI agents
- Can't check live calendar availability to book a specific slot, and can't take payments
- Email-only support on standard plans and a thin, middling review base (~3.5)
What users say: The review footprint is thin and mixed, which is worth weighing. Fans call it a solid level-one receptionist for the money. Critics cite the robotic voice, conversation loops on unusual requests, and slow support responses.
Best for: Local shops with lots of repeat callers that want a flat, minutes-free bill and can live with a more mechanical voice.
How to choose the right Grasshopper alternative
Start with one question: do you need a new phone system, or just answering? If Grasshopper's forwarding still suits you and you're mid-contract, an AI-only service (Smith.ai, Rosie, Goodcall) bolts on this week. If you're replacing the whole thing, a phone system with AI included costs less than running two tools within a few months.
Then match the pick to your pain:
You want one flat bill and the phone answered: dialnote. $49/mo for the whole team, AI receptionist and phone menu included, published rates for everything.
Your team texts more than it calls: Quo. Best-rated app here, with AI answering included in starter doses.
You want maximum included AI per seat: Dialpad, if you'll negotiate the answering piece with sales.
You need enterprise integrations: RingCentral, with eyes open on fees and metered AIR minutes.
You want to stay with GoTo: GoTo Connect, if quote-only pricing doesn't bother you.
Support quality decides it: Nextiva, on annual billing.
Lowest total cost for a solo operator: Phone.com with AI-Connect, or Rosie if you keep your current phone setup.
Honestly? In 2026, a business phone that can't answer a call for you is half a product. Every option above fixes that. Grasshopper doesn't, and at $14 to $80 a month it's not even saving you much for the privilege.
Which one actually fits your business? Call your own number after hours, then call a trial number from two of these. Ask a tricky question about your own services. The difference stops being abstract in about ninety seconds.
Can you keep your Grasshopper number when you switch?
Yes. Your Grasshopper numbers port to any provider on this list. The port takes 1 to 3 weeks, your new provider files the paperwork, and callers never notice the change.
Two Grasshopper-specific tips. First, don't cancel until the port completes; cancelling early can strand the number, and Grasshopper's own cancellation process (phone only, no self-serve) is a known complaint. Second, if you've fought Grasshopper's A2P texting registration, porting to a provider that handles registration for you clears that up in the same move. Our porting from Grasshopper guide walks through the exact steps and timelines.
The bottom line
Grasshopper was built for a world where forwarding calls to your cell was enough. That world ended when your competitors' phones started answering themselves.
The alternatives split cleanly. AI-only tools (Smith.ai, Rosie, Goodcall) patch the answering gap and leave your phone bill alone. Per-user systems (Quo, Dialpad, RingCentral, GoTo Connect, Nextiva, Phone.com) give you a modern platform where AI is included in doses, gated behind sales calls, or metered on top. And dialnote gives you the whole thing on one flat bill: a team phone system with unlimited users, an AI receptionist at a published $0.89/min, and the phone menu that keeps that meter under your control.
If Marcus's hang-up call sounded familiar, start a free 10-day trial of dialnote, no credit card needed, or put our pricing next to your Grasshopper bill plus whatever a missed water heater job costs you.
Frequently asked questions
For most small teams, dialnote. Its $49 plan covers your whole team's phone system with unlimited users, includes an AI receptionist that answers 24/7 at $0.89/min, and adds a phone menu so you control which calls the AI handles. Grasshopper offers none of that at any price.
No. Grasshopper has voicemail transcription and a basic auto-attendant, but nothing answers a call for you. Its official fix is Ruby, a human answering service that starts around $160/mo, which is double the price of Grasshopper's top plan.
Yes. Every provider on this list can port your Grasshopper number. The process takes 1 to 3 weeks, and your new provider handles the paperwork. Keep your Grasshopper account active until the port completes so you don't miss calls.
Per user, Phone.com: $15/user/mo plus $29.99/mo for its AI-Connect answering. AI-only, Rosie starts at $49/mo. For a team, dialnote's $49 flat plan with unlimited users plus $0.89/min AI usage is usually the cheapest total, since there's no per-seat charge.
Most tools meter it. dialnote bills $0.89/min with free monthly credits, Smith.ai charges roughly $1.67 to $3 per call, and Goodcall bills $0.50 to $0.79 per unique caller. The bigger lever is routing: send only the calls that need AI to the AI and the bill stays small.
Because it does less. Grasshopper is a virtual number that forwards calls to your cell phone. There's no AI, no integrations, and no API. You pay $14 to $80 a month for forwarding, and every missed call still ends in voicemail.

Written by
Lancelot Dsouza
Chief Marketing Officer, SmartReach.io
Lancelot Dsouza is the Chief Marketing Officer at SmartReach.io, where he built the Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success verticals from the ground up. With over 25 years of experience spanning digital marketing, business development, and strategic...
Lancelot Dsouza is the Chief Marketing Officer at SmartReach.io, where he built the Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success verticals from the ground up. With over 25 years of experience spanning digital marketing, business development, and strategic...
Related Articles

10 Best Nextiva Alternatives for 2026 (Cloud-First)
Compare the 10 best Nextiva alternatives with verified August 2026 pricing, AI answering costs, and desk phone support before you renew.

10 Best Goodcall Alternatives That Sound Human
Compare the 10 best Goodcall alternatives with natural AI voices, real calendar booking, and verified August 2026 pricing before you switch.

10 Best RingCentral Alternatives for Small Business
Compare 10 RingCentral alternatives for small business by real per-user cost, AI receptionists, and contract traps before you renew.
